“Elementary, my dear Hamlet!” – Copyright, Public Domain & You
Today, Robert Smedley gives us a primer on copyright and public domain, and how they affect writers. He promises to make it fun.
———————————————————————————————————————————–
Come with me now on a journey through time, space, and copyright law. Don’t worry, it won’t be dull. I promise. No, really. I promise. This isn’t an article about the ins and outs of copyright law – this is just a few simple, very basic, facts; the sort of things all writers should know. We begin in the future…
Sherlock Holmes Escapes Copyright
2022 AD, is a year when you’ll likely start to see an increase in the number of new Sherlock Holmes stories published by authors who aren’t Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Why? Because 2022 is when Holmes fully leaves copyright and enters the public domain, which means that anyone – you, me, anyone – can use him in their books. He joins such figures as Captain Nemo, Ebenezer Scrooge, Dracula, Hercules, and Cinderella. You may think Holmes is already in the public sphere. Well yes and no. You see, Holmes is a maddeningly grey area for copyright lawyers. All but one of his stories are now public domain. Whether that one story still under copyright means the character is under copyright, no one is quite sure. All anyone knows is that come 2022, the Great Detective will be fully jettisoned from the safety of author-ownership, and thousands of writers want to get their hands on him. Why have they had to wait this long to get to write about Holmes? Well for that we need to go back to 1886 and to Berne, Switzerland, for the founding of the Berne Convention, and copyright law as we know it…
The Birth of Copyright
Instigated by Les Miserables author Victor Hugo, the Berne Convention formalised copyright laws and guaranteed the right of you, the author, over your work. And it’s still in place, now covering 164 countries. So whether you’re in the US the UK or Uruguay, you’re seen as the owner of your writing and it can’t be exploited or copied without your prior consent, no matter which of those 164 countries it goes to. On top of that, there are half a dozen other separate laws and acts protecting your work, plus the individual laws of your country. So sleep soundly, your characters are safe. Thanks Victor Hugo!
It’s Easier Than You Think…

A lot of first-time writers get antsy about copyrighting their story and characters. They needn’t be. As soon as you express your idea, whether by writing it down or recording it or putting on it on in the form of a puppet theatre and videotaping it, it’s protected by copyright. You don’t need to apply for copyright. You don’t even need to put a © after you title. I wish I’d known that when I first started out. It would have saved me a lot of time and ©s. If you really want to protect your work, get a photocopy or save it on a USB, then post it to yourself. The postal stamp will be proof of date of your idea. Just don’t open the envelope.
Copyright only covers the way the idea is expressed, not the idea itself. You know how Avatar is basically Pocahontas? Well that’s the perfect example of the difference between idea and expression. Both have the same ideas, but both present them differently. You can copy the idea (ie: people meeting an alien culture), but not the expression (wheelchair-bound marine meeting big blue people). No lawsuits for you, crafty James Cameron!
Thanks to the Berne Convention and others, your work is protected across the globe: it can’t be copied, distributed or performed without your consent. You are the sole owner of the copyright. You also have ‘moral rights’, which protect an author’s works as an expression of their personality. Basically it stops someone coming along and changing your book to make you look like a nutcase.
How long do these lovely benefits last? The length of author copyright is the duration of the author’s life, plus 50-75 years after their death. So your protagonist and their plot is untouchable long after you’re just a footnote in someone else’s life. After that, they fall, Dante-esque into the public domain… Dum dum duuuum!
Public Domain – Go Nuts!
I may have accidentally put into your head the idea that the public domain is like a kids’ toy box of free-to-use characters. If I have, then good. There’s no catch; the intellectual property rights of characters and their stories have expired and they’re anyones to use and write about. Only occasionally will you find a character who has strings attached, like Winnie the Pooh or Peter Pan, but they’re rare special cases. It’s always best to check, and that can generally be accomplished with a quick Google.
There’s not much else to say about the public domain, except for the big fact that you can’t copyright a public domain character. Marvel Comics have been producing Thor comics for 50 years now. And if you want to write your own comic/book/puppet theatre show about Thor there’s not a damn thing they can do to stop you (unless you copy their design of Thor or stories etc.), because public domain characters are just that: public. I can write and publish a book about Captain Nemo and you can do the same and so can everyone else in the world. He’s ours now. So is his story. Everything from his Nautilus to his motives, right down to the life preservers. Yours and mine. Whether there’s any profit to be had in writing about him or other public domain dwellers is a different story entirely, and one for another day…
———————————————————————————————————————————–
So that’s it. Everything you need to know if you’re an author starting out. I’m no copyright expert, so if there’s something you feel has been missed and would like to add, or if you’ve a question, then please get in touch in the comments.
Images courtesy of genvessel and Jim Linwood.
Rob Smedley: Writer and Freelance Illustrator. Runs the ‘Too Close For Comfort‘ cartoon blog, and when not being creative with ink or making jokes about everything, Rob can be found at any bar that serves a good martini.


You’re assuming Disney won’t petition (and win as they always do) to extend copyright protection before 2022. Poor Sherlock Holmes. And poor us. We, as a culture, lose out by having such ridiculous lengths of copyright protection.
Intellectual property: that which, by definition is intangible and exists more in the mind than in physical form. Copyright is designed to designate ownership. But art belongs to society. Copyright was originally in place to allow an artist to profit on their work for a short period before allowing the public full access to what is, by definition, an intellectual property. But with protection in place 77 years after the creator’s death, for all intents and purposes, society can access non-tangible property only in spirit.
All of society moves forward by “standing on the shoulders of giants.” We build on what has come before in order to create something new. Lengthy copyright extensions limits the amount of “building” and “standing on [those] shoulders” that we can do.
I love discussing copyright issues. It’s a fascinating topic for me. In fact I’m working on a screenplay on this topic… and struggling to make it interesting. I hope we can generate some good discussion here.
I take it you’re not a fan of the CTEA ‘Mickey Mouse Protection Act’ then Eric? :) Yeah Disney do like their copyright, and they often seem to muddy the waters around the status of public domain characters, though I think in most cases they just hold the animation rights for any public domain characters they use don’t they? (correct me if I’m wrong!) So Holmes could certainly be written about, and certainly over here in the UK.
And you raise an interesting point about ’standing on the shoulders of giants’ – I was originally going to make this article about the worth of using public domain characters in new works and whether new stories can be built from them (like Alan Moore’s League of Extraordinary Gentlemen) by the writers of today or whether they should be left preserved and untouched by new hands. I think I’ll have to make it a follow up piece to this…
As always thanks for commenting Eric – great to see someone so enthusiastic about copyright law!
I know very little about copywright law. It is interesting to ready what the two of you have posted. To me, Mickey Mouse is and always shall be Disney. I just can’t imagine anyone using him in anything not Disney. Come on y’all — we just can’t mess with Disney.
I had read some about the fact that no one could copy my work for a certain number of years after my death, which is certainly a good thing. It just seems to me that protects my work for my kids — that is, once I get that “best seller” out there.
I do have a lot to learn and often wonder if, in my “old age” I will ever get it all. One thing about writing though, I don’t have to worry about being told that I’m too old.
Oh, and thanks for the tip about mailing my stories to myself and not opening the envelope.
MJ
Hey M J! Don’t worry about having to learn about copyright – you really don’t need to know anything. So long as you know how to write a good story, that’s all that matters at the end of the day. People in suits tend to take care of the rest :) Whatever happens, your ideas are well-protected (especially well-protected as you live in the US).
Right on, Robert. I think CTEA was probably one of the biggest mistakes the government has made as far as encouraging creativity.
I do see both sides of the argument here. As a copyright holder of works in many forms of media, I would hate my rights to be infringed upon. However, at this point no one has tried and even if they did, I would imagine that I would be flattered they thought my work was good enough to steal/emulate. Assuming such “theft” wasn’t for profit.
I would love to read your take on using public domain characters in current works! Great idea!
And as far as Disney goes, I believe they own the rights to the designs & voices of their public domain characters (Cinderella, Pinoccio, etc.). I’m not a lawyer, so I don’t entirely know all the specifics. But I believe they can animate and sell products with those designs to their heart’s (or wallet’s) content, but others can create a take on Cinderella as well. Just be careful about the look of your fairy godmother.
Thanks Rob. I’m so glad to know I don’t need to know anything — I definately fit that requirement ;o).
Actually, you hear so much about copyright that is contradictory that it becomes confusing. I had always been told that once you write something it is already copyrighted, and I knew about sending it to yourself, but not about not opening it. I wonder about e-mail though. Everything I write I send to my sister. It seems that would be a good way to prove it’s mine if there were ever a question. What do you think?
MJ
Certainly MJ, sending email is a good way as there’s a time/date stamp on the email, and you also have a third-party as extra proof. You can also send the email to yourself and it’d still be valid (it’s also a good way to back-up your work, as I’ve found personally). Just so long as you don’t accidentally delete them! :)
It sounds like you’re taking all the right measures, so I reckon your future best seller is safe.
I think Eric is right about Cinderella and Pinoccio. These are fairy tales that were out there long before Disney. Disney just borrowed them and created their own designs for them. That’s what we can’t touch. We can, of course use any of these old fairy tales because they are public domain. Good old Mickey, however, is all Disney.
I have a feeling some way Disney will always hold on to Mickey and of course they should have 100 percent control over their creation. You know it isnt just a Mouse on paper its Disneyland itself.