Are you a Literary Snob?

A good friend of mine and I have long discussed the division between what is considered quality literature vs. popular fiction. Quite often the two do not go hand in hand. The image of the unpublished writer who sits alone at his desk with his glass half-filled with cheap scotch while he taps away at his keyboard to create an original masterpiece which will embrace the souls and minds of his readers has become iconic. Writers and non-writers have adapted to this persona as the individual who will create our literary works of art. It appears that one must suffer, be disillusioned, and have a lust of contempt to create unparalleled fiction. The works of this person are studied and critiqued. Mass popularity may not follow until years later, when we realize how truly phenomenal they were. Thus, leaving us with a final belief that writers should follow the path of most resistance so that they, too, may one day be labeled as truly talented.
Do I believe in this statement? Well, yes and no.
An author’s work must derive from a place within them. Whether it is from their heart, or a place much darker, an author’s writing must be fed by emotion. Otherwise, it is empty drivel that a fifth grader will see through. This does not mean that all great works of fiction are required to have long words, random soliloquies, and over-the-top narratives that only a person with a degree from MIT will be able to decipher. The author’s writing, if fueled by passion, will find its place with both literary snobs and the masses.
What constitutes a snob? Do you only read works from Conrad, Joyce, Atwood, or Austen? Do you worry what others will say regarding your choice of reading material? Would you vehemently deny reading, or having any such knowledge of, popular fiction from such authors as King, Patterson, Brown, or Meyer? Are you a closet popular fiction reader? Then yes, my dear, you are a snob. I am not here to judge. I took a long hard look at my bookshelf before writing this article and found that the scale tipped quite heavily in favour of what are known as “great works of literature.” But scattered between Dennis Lehane, Carol Shields, and Ann-Marie MacDonald were James Patterson, Stephen King, Dan Brown and, yes, Stephanie Meyer.
Writers, whether they wish to admit this or not, want readers to enjoy their work.
A work created with passion will undoubtedly find a reader who will connect with the story and its characters. This is the starting point of great fiction. And it is what truly matters, snobbery aside.
Do you consider yourself a literary snob? What is on your bookshelf? If you wish to include some of the more notable literary works, a good site to bookmark is The Greatest Literature of all Time. This website is a wonderful reference for commentaries on authors, their works, and even film and video reviews on great works of literature. But then again, a book you pick up from the summer reading table at the bookstore might hold just as much value…
Giselle Maclean is Managing Editor of BreakFree, a blog that passionately charts her personal challenges as a wife, mother and friend; while managing a career within the financial services industry.


I hope I’m not. :) Takes all kinds of books to make a person well-read.
Great post…I’m tweeting.
Elizabeth
Mystery Writing is Murder
I agree with you Elizabeth. I believe our depth of knowledge arrives from work that is both good and at times not so good!
Thank you for your comments!
“Good taste” is overrated, and is, of course, completely subjective. So read what you enjoy and what makes you happy :)
Thanks for the article Giselle!
Christopher, once again you are on the mark. Art is subjective..all forms, whether we are discussing books, painting, and/or theatre. As long as it brings the recipient joy, then the artist has done a good job.
I always appreciate your comments. Thank you.
I know many people who are literary snobs. Just read what you like.Some people can’t process the so called ‘classics yet love some of the modern greats. Just beacuase some critic says it is good or bad doesn’t mean I wont read something.
Thanks Robert
Great point Robert. Though I may take what the critic writes into consideration, the end decision on whether or not something is a good read, will be mine.
Thank you very much for your comments.
I definitely think I’m a literary snob…not because I read Joyce, Atwood etc (which I don’t), but because I’m picky about what I like!
For me personally, quality literature is written by someone who writes passionately from the heart, whilst popular fiction is written in the hope that it will sell big, and is usually done by writing about “easy” subjects that are guaranteed to sell to a mass audience…jumping on the band wagon, I guess you would say. Like all the vampire-based books that seem to be appearing from every nook and crannie!!
I’m not saying that popular fiction can’t be a good read, because it ultimately depends what you’re looking for in a book!! I just think that it shouldn’t be surprised when we don’t take it seriously!
Kat Musselwhite has expressed exactly how I feel about it, word for word (for which I thank you).
I know what I like reading and what I don’t. It is snobbish in one sense, but it includes virtually none of the ‘great’ classics pre-dating the 20th century.
I don’t buy that populist genre books (such as vampires/ Fantasy) cannot contain great metaphors, wonderfully rich metaphors and challenging language. But of course in the main they don’t. I like books that challenge me, rather than ones that just require ticking off of expectations.
Thank you for your comments Kat. The entire Chicklit genre has fallen prey to exactly what you have mentioned. Though there may be works within the genre that are excellent, people tend to group all the works under one umbrella. We end up seeing all of the works as fluff. I think as long as we keep an open mind, then the chance to read great works, popular or classics will not be missed.
This might define me as a popular fiction snob but you can’t put Meyer’s name with Brown, Grisham and King. She is hardly a writer and definitely not a good one while the others border (in some works) on literary.
Hi J. No, I don’t think your comments mark you as a popular fiction snob. I think you are not a fan of Meyer. If you feel that some of the works of Brown, Grisham or King border on literary, then you are a very open person.
Great comment. Thank you.
I admit to being a literary snob. I’m open to reading new things and popular fiction, but I still except it to be quality work. I openly dislike Stephenie Meyer’s work and have a lot of issues with it, but I also know that no matter how much I rant it won’t change that other people like it, just like I know there are people who dislike things that I enjoy. That someone is reading at all is a good thing, and hopefully reading “popular” work will lead them to into other works. :)
Excellent point Jamie. I love to see kids, teens and adults read. Even if the work is mainstream, the act of reading opens a person’s mind to something new.
Thank you for your comments.
Yes, I am a literary snob. Nothing wrong with it.
My best analogy comes from a conversation I had in college with some friends about film. I mentioned how Kubrick’s 2001: A space Odyssey and Dr. Strangelove were my favorite movies. She said she liked Con Air.
If you don’t see the difference, well, nothing I can do about it.
LOL! It is good to know where you stand. Sometimes film classics and literary works get lost in translation. The lady in college may just have needed an interpreter.
Thank you for your comments Eric.
You would be hard pressed even among the academic set to find people who truly love writing themselves and who believe that works must be canonized to be “great.” That said, I just don’t enjoy most books by authors like King or Brown (never mind Meyer!). Without characters and ideas that have some depth, I get bored. “Plot point-plot point-plot point” writing à la Brown just doesn’t have it; I tried twice to read the Da Vinci Code and just couldn’t see what the fuss was about. I don’t know that that makes me a “snob,” though it suggests that I must be reading with different motivations from a majority of others. Still, if you enjoy reading something, I don’t think its reputation should be a deterrent. I like some fashion magazines, and the Harry Potter series held my interest. But I have also been led to many works of value by literary reviews and other “snobbier” channels. If it takes your imagination to places you consider to be worth going, then it has value: It makes your world more expansive and richer. I agree with the author on that. (Though you’d have to do some fancy talking to convince me that Meyer will take your imagination to a place I would consider to be worth going!)
I appreciate your comments Shea. I agree with your point that people who write great works, more times than not, do not wish or harbour fame. They hope to provoke thought, through their words. On the other hand, there are authors who write to become popular with the masses. And yes, their works at times lack passion.
I’m a total snob when it comes to literature. I do, however have one vice; fantasy novels. Ashamed to admit it, but much like a sneaked cigarette to the ashamed smoker, it is my lot.
With my dirty little habit swept aside and out of the way, I’m happy to say I read to broaden my horizons, learn new things, and gain a greater understanding of the world around me. There is nothing wrong with fiction; one need only look to ‘Candide’ or ‘Catcher in the Rye’ to see the profound effect a truly powerful book can have on the world. Fiction helps us embrace new ideas, and see the world around us through a new perspective, a third eye if you will.
Authors like Stephen King and Stephanie Meyer serve only to reduce what was once a rare and valued ability to a delivery system of fodder for consumption by lesser minds.
Topher, you know what I think…you are not a snob. The reason I feel confident making that point is this
” I’m happy to say I read to broaden my horizons, learn new things, and gain a greater understanding of the world around me.”
Honestly a snob does not read to broaden their horizons. A snob will read a particular work, because that is what they feel they should do.
Excellent comment. Thank you.
I’m a snob in the sense that I regard my own taste in reading as higher than other people’s. As you’ve mentioned in the article, the snobbery is not necessarily based on whether or not you read literature or popular fiction, but whether you actually care what people think of your reading habits, to the point that you would hide your more embarrassing books, say, under a bed.
Most popular fiction I read in younger years, back when I was less discerning about book choices, I have since stopped reading, simply because I prefer work that’s original and well-written.
Perhaps elitist is a more appropriate way to describe my taste?
Thank you for your comments Elena. Elitist is an excellent term. Your choice in writing evolved as your view on your world evolved. You read what you enjoy, and those standards are set by you.
“This above all: to thine own self be true.”
My filmmaking background is kicking in as I say, “you can learn more from a bad film than you can a good one.” Writing, at least for me, is very similar. Reading a bad novel, or watching a bad film, you can analyze and ask, “what do I hate about this? Why doesn’t it work? How could I make it better?” Whereas good books, and films, these of so-called “classics” and “masterpieces,” are difficult to critique in terms of how you could improve upon it. Not everyone can be a Joyce, a King, a Capra, or a Bay (and yes, I’m probably going to filmmaking hell for putting those two names next to each other). These masters have made classics by speaking in their own voice and creating art in their own way.
Am I a literary snob? I’m gonna say no. My shelves don’t contain masterworks. They are adorned with the likes of Grisham, Cussler, Crichton, Brown, Palahniuk, and a few choice others. Does this mean I am opposed to the classics? Not at all, they are just not my preference.
Am I a film snob? Again, not really. My shelves cover films from “Casablanca” to the latest “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.” Variety is the spice of life.
Why be embarassed about your preferences? Why add to the skeletons in your closet (or under your bed)? You are who you are, and being true to that self, literary choices included, is the best way to find your unique voice and create a masterpiece.
Well said Eric! I do have to admit that you are a bit brazen to put Capra and Bay in the same sentence. But I like that. I have watched numerous bad films and read books that probably should not be seen by anyone. Through the countless hours lost that I will never regain, I have learned one thing. The ability to share your work with the world takes guts and conviction. I guess that is where my soft spot lies. I believe someone (besides mom and dad) should read or watch what they have created.
Thank you very much for your comments.
I think the references to Colleges and Academic readers is interesting, as there is a clear divide there from the mainstream market. I don’t write only to be read in academic circles, that would be cutting off your nose to spite your face. Yet my work is sufficiently challenging in its language and narrative form, to naturally veer towards such a constituency. I have never read Brown, Myer et al, but I would never criticise what for them is a hugely successful formula.
Thank you for your comments Marc. I believe that work created through a writers love, passion and honesty has the ability to transcend all circles, academic or mainstream.