“Bang!” – Using & Avoiding Chekhov’s Gun
If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don’t put it there.

How many times have you read a novel or watched a film in which a seemingly insignificant object or piece of information goes on to save the day? This, my friends, is the literary technique known as Chekhov’s Gun. It comes from Anton Chekhov’s belief presented very plainly in his quote above. Basically, what he’s saying is that you can’t introduce a loaded rifle and then never use it. Obviously this doesn’t apply solely to guns – this refers to any object to which you give loaded significance.
Focus
Now, when you’re writing a scene, you will want to describe your location. It would be pretty strange writing if you didn’t. Say you’re describing a tower room which is currently the prison of a frustrated princess. Your details, such as the tapestries on the wall, pieces of furniture or the caged bird by the window, are essentially set-dressing, and help set the scene. However, if you suddenly shift your focus to a heavy candlestick on the dresser near the door, the reader might assume the princess will, at some point, use said candlestick to clobber a guard over the head and make her escape. When she doesn’t do that, the reader will be awfully disappointed. In this case, the candlestick has become the gun, and needs to be returned to its rightful status as mere ornament.
Foreshadowing?
Chekhov’s Gun occasionally gets referred to as foreshadowing, which isn’t strictly true. Foreshadowing would relate to things that are mentioned so that when you reach your big reveal, the reader is surprised, but not totally shocked beyond belief since you’ve given them tiny clues along the way. This becomes apparent when the reader goes back and reads for a second time – suddenly your little clues become obvious, and the reader wonders why they didn’t get the twist the first time around. Psycho or The Sixth Sense would be good examples of this.
Be Aware of the Gun
So if Chekhov’s Gun isn’t foreshadowing, what is it? Well, boiled down to its simplest form, it simply means this – make sure everything is mentioned for a reason, and don’t heap significance on something that doesn’t mean anything. When I’m writing, one of the edits that I do on a finished piece is what I call my Chekhov’s Gun Edit. I go back through and highlight passages where I feel I’ve hyped up a location, object or character that has no intrinsic importance to the plot. Occasionally these things might inspire new thoughts and lead to new subplots, in which case I leave them alone as they gain new significance. Otherwise I scale back the emphasis. The second stage of the edit is to find those objects, locations or characters that will have importance later, and then I make sure they sparkle when they’re first introduced.
MacGuffin
Of course, no discussion of Chekhov’s Gun would be complete without reference to the MacGuffin. This is almostChekhov’s Gun in reverse, in that something is given great significance but ultimately turns out to mean nothing. However, the MacGuffin is not irrelevant – it is invariably the catalyst for prompting the action in the first place. It could be a stolen object that several parties are trying to find, or a missing person.

Think of the briefcase, or even the watch, in Pulp Fiction – neither of them are important in themselves as they’re only important for bringing the characters together in a certain way. It is the events surrounding the characters that become the focus of the film. The journey becomes more important than the destination.
Using Them
The Macguffin is relatively easy to plant as you’re writing if you know where the story will go, and you know that the object/person/place won’t have much significance later, while Chekhov’s Gun is harder to control, especially if you’re not sure how the story will end as you’re writing it. If you do know how it will end, then be sure to re-read your writing as you go to make sure you’re not placing too much emphasis on something innocuous. If you don’t know how it will end, wait until you’re finished to look out for any Chekhov’s Guns in case something you emphasise early on turns out to be unimportant after all.
Used properly, both devices can help to create memorable fiction, and they can both help with that pesky writer’s block if you look out for them during written passages when you feel that you’re stuck. As with everything related to writing – have fun with them!
——————————————————————————————————————————
What are some of your favourite examples of Chekhov’s Gun or the MacGuffin? What success have you had using them in your own stories? Please share your thoughts and comments below!
Images courtesy of Wikipedia and Snopes.com.


Thanks for this article Icy – really great stuff. I’ve always been aware of Chekhov’s Gun (less so of the MacGuffin) but have never focused on it when writing a story. Your idea of a ‘Chekhov’s Gun Edit’ is incredibly useful. Something very practical I hope (and am sure) our readers will take away from your article.
I also -love- the idea of using these devices to overcome writer’s block and to take your story in new and interesting directions. Thanks!
I came across the MacGuffin first when I studied Hitchcock at uni, and then discovered Chekhov’s Gun and thought “Oh I like this.” It’s also really handy for unsticking yourself in writing. I don’t really believe in writer’s block per se, because you’ve got an entire chunk of writing there, just waiting to be unravelled!
Yet another great article Icy! I had not thought of using Chekhov’s Gun as an editing tool, but it does make so much sense. You’re right – it’s so very irritating when you expect an object to be used later in the story and then it never gets used, the worst thing you can do to your reader. What’s worse is when a character is introduced that is not at all signficant to the story.
To jump ahead a bit, one of the best examples of foreshadowing I’ve ever read is Shutter Island by Dennis LeHane – the movie too is done very well. In fact, Shutter Island is a great book to study when looking to improve any area of our craft.
Thanks for another great post!
I’ve never read Shutter Island but I’ve seen the movie – I’ll have to check out the book!
Oh yes, Icy, you must read the book, and check out Larry Brooks’s deconstruction of it at StoryFix http://storyfix.com/category/shutter-island-deconstruction. That series taught me A Lot, not only about foreshadowing but also pacing, tension, dialogue, and especially characterization.
Thanks Deanna, for the suggestion of Shutter Island. I think I will get the book and read.
Thanks for the article Icy. I had heard of the idea that if you describe a gun you better use it. I didn’t know it was called Chekhov’s Gun. I wonder what Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock have to say about that. (Forgive me please.) I had heard the term MacGuffin, but didn’t know what it was.
This piece made me start thinking of my own stories to decide if I have anything like these. One story came to mind, called Fisherman’s Paradise. In the story the man’s wife paints a picture of an island in the middle of a lagoon or cove or something like that. She tells her husband it is a Fisherman’s Paradise. In the end of the story she uses some ancient spell to send him into the painting. That particular story starts out with him actually waking up on the island and not remembering how he got there or where there is. It builds up till he remembers what she did. Is that a form of foreshadowing? Or is that something totally different?
No, that’s not foreshadowing. If you were using foreshadowing, you wouldn’t start out with him in the painting – he’d be in the real world and you’d make mention of the painting, and maybe some mention of her witchy abilities. To have him already in the painting and simply remembering is flashback.
Okay, I should have known that.
I really love these chats we all have in here. It provides a catalyst for change that can come about from even simple pieces of information. You and the others who have been writing these articles have certainly helped me a lot since I began receiving Fuel Your Writing in my e-mail. Thank you so much for doing this and providing such great articles.
You’re welcome MJ! It’s so great to hear that we have been helping and inspiring you – that’s what Fuel Your Writing is all about!
When I teach writing I always mention Chekhov’s gun. When I teach literature, I also mention Chekhov’s gun, but in a different way. Do you think that readers/scholars/critics might utilize the knowledge of Chekhov’s gun differently than writers of literature?
Love the idea of this editing technique. Thanks for sharing!
-Miss GOP
Excellent Article!
I love literary devices like this. I always find it interesting to learn about things we see and use everyday.
I had no idea about the name of the Chekhov’s Gun concept, but of course have been familiar with it through my film studies. Hitchcock, as Icy mentioned, used this frequently: show the viewers the bomb so they are one step ahead of the character – this builds tension in the scene. But of course to pay off that tension the bomb does have to explode. To this day I notice these little devices, keenly picking up on that all-of-a-sudden (and often out-of-place) close-up shot that establishes Chekhov’s Gun that you know will pay off later. In film there is an art to making this a subtle reveal, one that few have mastered.
Excellent examples with the MacGuffin and foreshadowing; very effectively explains the difference. Not to be confused with the Red Herring – the idea/person/object that’s in place specificially as misdirection.