Dealing with Criticism
No matter what you do in life, at some stage you are bound to find yourself on the receiving end of criticism. Whether it’s at work, at home, at school or at play, someone will find fault with what you’re doing. Of course, if you’re a writer, you have to actively solicit such criticism in order to a) find out why your work either isn’t being accepted, or isn’t selling, and b) improve your work in more general terms.

Constructive Criticism?
Personally, I dislike the distinction drawn between constructive and deconstructive criticism – whichever way you slice it, it’s still criticism. I prefer the word “feedback”. Someone is still pointing out the weak areas, or things they feel I should change, etc., but psychologically it makes a big difference. Criticism makes me hear “You’re rubbish! Give up now! This work is so flawed, you ought to be ashamed of yourself!”, while feedback makes me hear the actual comments of the reader.
Beta Reading
If you’ve never tried it, it’s quite a simple concept and very useful. Choose a handful of your closest writer friends, and ask them nicely if they’d like to read a particular piece for you. Specify if you want them to catch typos, poor grammar etc., or if you just want comments on the work as a whole. Maybe you want them to pay special attention to dialogue, scene transitions, or plot holes. Make sure they know you will do the same for them – good beta reading partnerships depend on give and take! Once you get the work back, read their comments, and decide which you agree with, and which you don’t. If you feel changes are necessary, then by all means make them.
I do feel that it helps if your beta readers know you, since they’re likely to already be aware of your writing style, and you’re more likely to trust their judgement. After all, writers can’t ever be subjective enough to experience their work as a reader would, so we have to trust those people who read our work to tell us how it comes across to them. Cinema has been employing test audiences for years, and we all know about the concept of the pilot show in television, so why should writers miss out on a useful tool to improve their work?
But how should you deal with criticism or feedback? Whether you’ve asked for it explicitly (as in you’ve handed your work to beta readers) or you’ve put a story on your blog in the hope of getting comments, then learning how to use the feedback, or shrug off the criticism, is a key skill. Here are my top five things to bear in mind when the Criticism Critter comes a-callin’.
1) Learn How to Listen

This person is approaching your work as a reader. They don’t have access to the vast well of back story, character insight and so on that you have. If readers find the story confusing, then that isn’t their problem, it’s yours, and you need to listen to what they’re saying in order to revise the story until they understand it the way you do. A writer’s job is to communicate the story – it isn’t the reader’s job to figure out what they think the writer might be trying to say. So put your ego to one side and listen, really listen, to what they’re saying.
2) No Need to Make Every Suggested Change
Re-read the particular passage or sentence that the reader has flagged up, and then read their comment. Now you’ve put some distance between yourself and the work, can you see where they’re coming from? If you can, then by all means make the change – you may read their comment and wonder why you were so blind you didn’t see the problem area yourself. If you don’t agree, leave it until later and move on. You can always come back and double-check later. If you still don’t agree, then leave your work as it is.
3) Separate the Wheat from the Chaff

You can’t please every person all of the time, so don’t worry if you don’t please 100% of your readers. If you send your story to ten people, and nine people love it, then don’t rewrite your work to suit the one who doesn’t. Accept that the work might not be to their personal taste. Don’t disregard their comments entirely since they might have still raised some useful points, but don’t over-edit the work to try to please everyone. If you, and the majority of your readers, are happy with it, then it’s done.
4) Get a Second Opinion
There’s nothing stopping you asking a friend to read over any comments you’ve received from others. I’ve had comments in the past that I just couldn’t agree with, only to show writer friends who couldn’t understand the comments either. Other people may be able to put the comments into context, give their own opinions, or massage a dented ego. Power Tool said it best when they said that two heads are better than one.
5) Criticism is Only an Opinion
This stuff isn’t cast in stone. No one’s opinion is. While you need to pay attention in the first place to check your reader isn’t telling you something fundamental, and you need to weight that comment up against other comments you’ve received, you don’t need to use it as an absolute truth. If you don’t agree with it, or you don’t think the comment is valid, then you’re perfectly entitled to completely ignore it. Just don’t do it with every piece of feedback you get, or it makes asking for it a waste of time.
———————————————————————————————————————————
What about you? Have you got any particular strategies for coping with criticism? Please share them in the comments below!
Images courtesy of Hypnosis Health Info, Melvin Gaal and CIMMYT.


I write about this a lot lately and talk about it with my students pretty often, too. I like the point you make about not needing to take every suggestion. Feedback is (often) a way to get another pair of eyes on your work and to help you see it in another way, from another perspective.
I also warn my students to try not to be defensive or resistant to feedback. Do you think that there is a graceful or professional way to receive harsh feedback? Thanks!
-Miss GOP
I find that when I don’t necessarily agree with feedback, I’ll still see if there’s a way that considering it might improve the work, and then I’ll go back to the person who gave it to say “That’s a good point…how do you think it would work if I did X, Y or Z?” so they know I’ve taken it on board.
For harsh feedback, I think it’s probably best just to thank the person, tell them you’ll take it on board, and then lick your wounds in private. It’s important to say thank you to recognise the time they’ve taken to leave feedback, and you never know, perhaps you may ask them again in future, but it’s probably best to withdraw at that point – no one likes to see a tantrum!
I always do test reading, but I specifically avoid other writers for that purpose. I want to know what readers think. Writers tend to try to give me too much advice regarding the business aspects of the book: what genre(s) it fits best, its relative marketability, etc. Readers will tell me if the story was compelling or boring, if the characters were lively or flat, and more important things like that.
As long as you make sure at least a couple of your test readers are grammar nitpickers, they’ll catch enough of your typos, awkward wordings, and bad edits to render the rest suitable to be sent to a professional editor at a publisher.
But yes, I’m with you on not being able to please everyone. On my most recent test read, two of five people found a particular scene problematic, and I know I was cheating a bit with it anyway, so it needs to go. On my last novel, however, one reader said it had too much science fiction, another said it had too little science fiction, and a third said it was just about right, so I went with a Goldilocks theory on that and kept it as it was.
The only time I chafe at criticism is when a test reader gets personal about it, but those people are usually angling for some other kind of attention (ie trying to provoke personal drama) so while it is frustrating, I’m able to ignore it in terms of the writing.
I can see your point about getting readers to test-read as they’re essentially who would be reading it anyway, but other writers can often give more useful insights as to why a certain thing doesn’t work – it can certainly help to give you an idea how to change what doesn’t work, rather than just knowing it doesn’t.
Luckily I’ve never had someone be personal in their criticism – why would you even do that?
True: writers will frequently be able to give that insight. Maybe it should be a good mix of writers and non-writers.
That being said, I’ve received some pretty good articulate insights from non-writers too. And I had to cut one writer out of my test pool because she was effectively attempting to re-write everything into her own style.
A mix sounds like the best solution, just like it’s important to get a mix of other demographics to help avoiding being too niche.
At least we don’t have to take anyone’s advice that we don’t want to. When someone gives me advice that I don’t think will work or if they are just trying to get me to write in their style I just thank them and stick with my own style.
I’ve had writers try to get me to rewrite in their style, or to add their own ideas, irrespective of what I’ve been trying to do, which is why I’m quite selective when choosing writers to beta read.
Thanks for the article Icy. I belong to a couple of sites where I can get feedback on my work. I find that this feedback is a valuable tool not only for making my work better, but also for learning and growing as a writer. Some people on the sites give excellent feedback with lots of suggestions and sometimes catching errors I should have caught myself. I always thank those who critique my work.
Sometimes I run across people who really get upset about feedback, even though I try to be really careful and kind in giving feedback. Some people just can’t take criticism.
Then there are those who are very harsh. I’ve had some who critiqued my work that I thought must be having a bad day and I was available to vent on. If they do actually say something that could be considered a critique I certainly thank them. If, however, it seems they are only trying to be hurtful, I just ignore it and move on. I’ve never had anyone do this in person. I guess that would be another problem all together. I guess with my psyc degree I could psychoanalyze them. ;o)
I think it’s easy to tell if someone is being harsh just for the sake of it, but you can just happily ignore them and move on!
That’s the joy of getting feedback on-line. You can just move on.
Could you suggest some of these sites for those of us who didn’t know this service was out there?
Thanks!
The site I go to the most is fanstory.com. Not everyone is professional (that’s why we go, so we can learn from those who know more than we do and we grow from there), but I get lots of good professional quality critiques. Other good sites are critiquecircle.com, writing.com, and Writer’s Digest has a florum where you can share your writing and get good help … I think that is writersdigest.com. I know there are more out there, but I can only look at so many. I’m sure y’all can find one you like the most.
Excellent guidance, Icy!
Criticism can be hard, but with experience in receiving it, both constructive and destructive, it does become easier to take and accept… and you learn to tell the difference between the two.
Yes, these things definitely get easier with experience!
I am so grateful that someone is paying attention, that I salivate over criticism. I am fascinated and detached at the same time. I especially love the haters. I learn the most from them about myself.
I can’t say that I love the haters, but I make sure that I take away something positive, even from the haters.
I love this advice! I find that setting the comments aside for a few days makes a huge difference. I see things more clearly and with less emotion this way. Thank you.
Clarity and perspective always come with distance!
Great post! My rule of thumb with feedback (that I have to keep telling myself) is that if you have to explain yourself, you need to rewrite it. When someone comments and I find myself grumpily saying to the comment, “Yes, but don’t you see…?” it’s time to take a breath and make a change so that the reader gets what I’m saying. Like you said, it’s not the reader’s job to figure us out.
It is SO hard to learn to set your ego aside and know that it’s not personal. They don’t hate you, and they don’t hate your writing.
Off to retweet this…
Thanks for spreading the word Maryanne!
I used to be terrible for assuming people just “didn’t get it”. Sometimes whatever you’re trying to do or say IS really obvious and only one person out of fifty doesn’t get it, but if enough people say it…
Glad you found it helpful!