Where Does Poetry Begin?
Any person who is above the age of five, and quite a few under, know what poetry is. That is, they know what a poem tends to look like and feel like. They can recite “Mary Had a Little Lamb” without a second thought and then move on to the “practical concerns” of everyday life. But what is a poem? What constitutes it? What gives it power? What use is it? And even if we answer all of these questions, how can we use this to actually make a difference in what we’re writing?

Most people who would call themselves poets will readily acknowledge that they know very little about the source of their poems. For most of us, poems are those things that come into our rooms at 3 AM and sit on our shoulder until we decide to throw them onto a piece of paper. When we pick up that piece of paper and read it back to ourselves in the morning, it often comes across as something mysterious, something that was channeled through us as if poets were literary shamans. In this article, I will outline one way of looking at a poem that will help the burgeoning writer make sense of what she has scribbled out the night before.
Poetry – The Snapshot
This is one description of poetry that is especially close to my heart, probably because I’m such a visual person. Poetry operates according to a different logic than prose (often this comes across as “no logic”), so readers who are used to the methods of prose will often find themselves stumped when they’re presented with a poem to read.
Prose often works through a series of events, normally following a plot that emphasizes the arc of a character toward a transformative end (though I won’t even try to bring Joyce or Faulkner into this). Prose tends to be more “mathematical,” though I use that term loosely. Main Character’s natural tendency to fear monkeys + Heroine’s natural ability to identify fruit + Villian’s desire to get the Golden Banana + Final Epic Battle = Story. I’m not saying that prose is a bad way of writing, just that it works in a fundamentally different way than poetry. Presenting a sequence of events, the form of prose connects perfectly with the human mind’s way of constructing and analyzing information.
Poetry, in its purest sense, is a relationship between two seemingly unrelated objects. Often, these two objects cannot be rationally harmonized with each other. It’s more like a snapshot of life that has a title scribbled on it that doesn’t seem to have anything to do with the picture. For example, if you were given a snapshot of a sunset, and it had written on the back in blue sharpie, “the heart of the earth,” there are tons of ways you could interpret this. The red of the sunset connects naturally to the color of the human heart, and so the sun is a heart that is receding into the earth. This could mean that the earth is slowly hiding its heart from us because we’ve hurt it with our pandemic pollution. This simple interpretation came from comparing the image of a sunset with the nature of the human heart.

Just for the sake of having a more literary example, here’s a famous poem by Ezra Pound:
IN A STATION OF THE METRO
The apparition of these faces in the crowd;
Petals on a wet, black bough.
I know you’re probably thinking that I left out some piece of the poem. Actually, I didn’t. That’s the entire thing. This is a poem that is consistently placed in literary anthologies for one reason — it is representative of the simplest that poetry can get. It is based on one image and one description of that image. In a way, it is an atom of poetry.
But what is constant throughout all of these examples? It’s a little term that we all heard back in grammar school and are probably still hearing today — metaphor.
The Fact of Metaphor
The poet must use this system of comparing one thing to another through metaphor as his primary method of getting to the riches of the text. This method, however, is part of what has been so off-putting to some who read, specifically those who despise, poetry because it does not “come right out and say it.” But this is necessary in poetry, and any poet can attest to this, because it is impossible for a poet to “come out and say” anything, since the thing that the poet wishes to communicate is something that lies eternally “behind” the words.
The fact that not all readers recognize this revealing effect in reading poetry is not a strike against metaphor, but is rather a sign of its ingenuity. When a magician is performing some trick on the stage, he or she is trying to show the audience something that is not physically present on the stage. The magician does not show the audience her wires, the holes in her cloak, or the trapdoor leading to the basement. She hides them not because these things are not necessary to the illusion, for in fact they are vitally necessary, but rather because if the audience sees these things as they exist physically, it will never see clearly the illusion presented by the cooperation of the objects in the metaphor.

Now this metaphor naturally leads to some negative conclusions concerning the work of poets, but not all of these negative conclusions must be disregarded. Poets do lie, just as painters lie. Poets make it seem as if things disappear and that bunnies really do come out of hats. The difference between the magician’s audience and the poet’s audience is that the readers of good literature realize that, in a way, things do disappear. They recognize that on some other level, things are not as they seem, and that they can never quite explain why they feel this way. This is the beauty and magic that makes poetry so consistently exciting.
Conclusion
This is only one way that you can look at the art of poetry; trust me, there are plenty of others. Whenever you’re hunched over your Cheerios trying to work through the mess of last night’s draft, try taking a look at your work through one of these lenses and see what happens.


Solid post, Ben — approaching poetry from this vantage is definitely eye-opening. I’ve never really studied poetry, but after reading this post I now have a greater appreciation for the art.
I think the trick to understanding poetry is keeping an open mind. Those shut off to the world of personal expression and artistic creation most likely won’t have the patience for a poetry — just as they most likely won’t have the patience for other forms of art that are based in feeling just as much as thought, such as abstract expressionism in painting for example.
Thanks for sharing!
What’s everyone’s favorite poet or poem?
Thanks Chris!
It’s certainly true that a reader has to approach a poem with an open mind. Using feeling in an analysis is one of the most difficult thing for burgeoning students of poetry to do, but it is vitally necessary.
As for my favorite poem, that’s definitely “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” by T.S. Eliot. That poem changed my life.
I have been thinking about
what makes a poem a poem
I have been making poems all my life
But more so recently
What got me thinking about what makes a poem
Is a comment that I made on another blog.
The blog post I was responding to
concerned finding our reason for being alive
Several days after posting my comment
The blog owner posted a reply
and later sent me email
Saying it was not permissible
to post poems as comments
What I wrote does not rhyme
It basically presents ideas
but it is broken up into “stanzas”
It seems to me to be
neither fish nor fowl
I choose to agree
with the blog owner
and think of my comment
as a poem of sorts.
But why?
I’ve broken up my comment here too
Does that make this a poem as well?
Thanks for any thoughts you might have
Yamabuki
This is the comment, modified slightly, that I posted:
I’ve heard that in some tribal cultures
There will come a wise person
To speak to the soul
Of the child in the womb
The child is asked
Why it has chosen to take birth
What is its reason
For coming into this world
Sometimes this is all
Other times further dialog ensues
Concerning the reasons and rhymes
Of this new life coming towards birth
Years later when the child
Is starting to understand life
The wise person approaches the child
And begin a dialog
Or more accurately
Returns to the dialog
That started when the child
Was still in the womb
This was not done for me
Probably it was not done for you
Still something in us longs to know
Why we are here
What gives meaning to our life
Why keep going
And many more
Good questions all.
I believe that the answers
Always lie within
There are different ways
Of finding why we are here
Meditation quites the mind
But it can also help find answers
Dreams too
Can aid our search
Standing on a bridge
Waiting to jump
Looking for answers
This is the knife’s edge way
Cutting through
To the center
Going to the heart
To see who you really are
Now look to see if you can
Look even deeper
There is always more
Wisdom within us all
Yamabuki
Since the advent of free verse, these distinctions between what is and is not poetry have been constantly blurred. I’m not a New Critic, so I wouldn’t argue that the text has any standing on its own without the writer and the reader. So, from that perspective, a poem becomes a poem between the negotiation of meaning and form that occurs when a reader interacts with a writer.
That answer might sound a little convoluted, but I hope I helped answer your question.
Ben:
Since I am a poet, your post resonated with me. It really did. And thanks for sharing ideas.
What a coincidence: T.S. Eliot is also one of my favorite poets–he won the Nobel Prize for Literature. And the “Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” also changed my life. Wow!
I find it really hard to answer, however, who my favorite poet is. One thing I can say for sure: it is certainly not me. Not at all. However, I love to read the poems written by the following:
Pablo Neruda, Emily Dickinson, Sara Teasdale, Robert Frost, Walter Savage Landor, Shakespeare, The English Romantics (Shelley, Keats, Byron), John Milton, etc.
Truth be told, there are so many others it would fill volumes.
As a result, I don’t have a “favorite” poet; nor can I compare one poem against another.
I like poems for different reasons and like to play with poetry. For me, these great poets are mystics and prophets.(Reading their works has enriched my life, truly. I believe it too.)
And I feel I am better off for having read about their metaphors and images. I also think reading poetry can make you a better, more humane person and it exercises your mind.
For example, reading Joseph Brodsky and Derek Walcott swept me off my feet. Wow.
Reading such wonderful poets transports you to a different plane. Out of this world. Cheers!
You’ve got a great list of poets there (especially Milton). I’m glad you enjoyed it!
Very deep. Very insightful. A post worth of a college course.